Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Beth Silvers's avatar

It's interesting to read the comments on this episode because I did not plan or or perceive it in real time to be primarily about the gender conflict/crisis of men and boys. Anytime this topic comes up, I feel a strain in myself that the comments illuminate.

On one hand:

I have two daughters, and I worry about them being respected in the world (broadly--will they be physically respected, will their civic rights be respected, will they be respected in workplaces, in churches, etc). I also worked as a young professional in a profession that was dominated not just by men but by a kind of Mad Men hangover. And we have extensively covered what's happening to women all over the country since the Dobbs decision. So I hear and feel everyone who's saying a version of "excuse me? Women have not dethroned men and become the oppressors."

On the other hand:

I'm pretty sure Sarah taught me the expression "just because the person next to you has cancer doesn't mean your foot isn't broken." I don't want to be competitive about the relative suffering, historically or presently, of men and women. I see that many, many men of all ages and at all levels of socioeconomic status are not flourishing. I see an education system and jobs landscape that are out of sync with each other in ways that will likely compound this problem over the next generation. And I observe that my own reaction to this problem vacillates between "emergency! You, Beth, should figure out how to fix this!" and "seriously? If there's a problem, you made it" -- two reactions that are equally condescending and useless in their own ways AND that I would never direct toward the complaints of any other categorical group.

I appreciate the push, always, to work through this strain in myself. I realize in every conversation about boys and men that probably the best posture I can take is just to listen and care and believe that there is a real challenge here and consider what that means.

I tremendously appreciate Matt's willingness to discuss this more the comments. I respect Matt's approach very much.

And I appreciate, always, all of you listening and thinking with us and expressing your views so openly.

Expand full comment
Xergio's avatar

Greetings from your local clueless man.

This episode left me with encountered feelings. First, I think like most commentators here, certain word shocked me. Specially as the dad of a girl in the spectrum and borderline IQ. I think saying “r-word” as he wrote above would have conveyed the meaning without the, imho, the unnecessary shock. Second, I am fine with meeting where they are at. But to paraphrase and misuse Jesus’s words, what good will it do to a party to win an election if they lose their soul? There has to be a way to do both. Third, I heard few words repeated many times in different combinations. Fourth, on the very positive side I agree that tribalism is a huge problem. The acceptance wholesale of everything a group stands for just to belong is problematic. Also agree that normal life (as if I knew what that is) is a better barometer than focus groups and consultants on what’s really going on. Finally, I agree that being outside politics is good. However, only politics is narrowly defined as partisan politics. Partisan politics is about the “activities, actions, and policies used to gain and hold power in a government or to influence the government”. I am more Aristotelian with a broad view of politics as the “art of living together in community” It’s about citizenship, responsibility, ethics, and the conditions for human dignity. Fifth, I have never understood what is the “man problem”. If you can, please, enlighten me. Or point me to a good resource that helped you.

A. The problem is feminization? First of all, here we go again blaming women. I’ll be honest, I wish I was half the woman my wife is. I’d be at least three times a better person than I am right now.

B. Where are men (especially white, bro type men) prevented from participating, having a seat at the table, and normally at the head of the table, who is systematically excluding them?

C. I don’t deny that there are records of deaths of despair disproportionately among certain groups.

D. But why are men self selecting out of college or trade education? Why the incel phenomenon? I don’t know. I am mystified by this.

E. I am not a man’s man. More Belle than Gaston in my preferences, still a cisgender straight married to a woman guy. Just not good at expectorating, haven’t been in a fisticuffs since 4th grade, never had owned, used, and held just once, a gun. I am not into sports, neither participating nor watching. I don’t hunt. I don’t like things with bone like wings, ribs, that kind of stuff. I love the great indoors, books, digital coloring, and cheese. I barely know where the gas goes in my car, don’t care for cars, bikes or boats, and don’t know how to fix things at home. Am I the problem? Have I’ve been feminized? Should I be more of a macho?

F. I wasn’t born to money, and didn’t made any. I am a couple of paychecks away from homelessness.

G. So there’s my ignorance in display. I don’t understand the “man problem”.

Here ends this week edition of long winded ramblings with X.

Expand full comment
71 more comments...

No posts