Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Xergio's avatar

I appreciate this newsletter today because it really irks me. And I think that’s what this podcast, newsletter, and community provides. Not annoyance. But a variety of perspectives and opinions that don’t always align with mine. So in that sense is good for me to hear them. Is a great place to learn “the way of the #nuance”. “Keep it nuanced y’all” has been my favorite tag line. I love it in my mind, but my heart sometimes is “nope”.

I have no problem with “weird” as a descriptor in the context Walz said it, as an opposite of normal. I consider even mild because I think that POS is a better descriptor, or at least the modern convention weird af.

In the other, more rational hand, “weird” is dehumanizing insofar it’s reductive of a person to a label. But even more so because it “otherize” them. When we concibe someone as “other” is the beginning of a bad road to take.

Therefore, I should have more issue with “weird”. And it was this irksome newsletter that I didn’t even finished (yet) that reminded me of that. Thank you Ms. Silvers for annoying some sense into me.

Expand full comment
Dee's avatar

First of all, Beth, I love today's newsletter from you more, I think, than any other PP newsletter. Well written with great examples. Applause, applause applause.

Second, Mary Jo's prom party is epic. That it not a word I usually use, but there's no other way to describe it! I love it! I wish my husband liked to dance, because I would totally do this. Of course I still could, but it would make him so uncomfortable that I would be uncomfortable. (I'm not even talking about asking him to learn a dance - just the music would get to him, even as I loved it.)

Thanks for a great newsletter!

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?